Whether one likes it or not, Tesla and SpaceX’s Elon Musk has emerged as one of the most prominent figures in American innovation, and his accomplishments cannot be overlooked. While criticisms have abounded around his tenure at Tesla, Musk’s guided the company through difficulties that once almost sunk it, subsequently turning it into a high-flying, constituent of the S&P 500.
Even if the truth may wound, if Musk’s initial ambitions are to be successful in leading America through a period of newfound technological sophistication, it will be largely beneficial for society as a whole. It’s no secret that most Americans lean towards “innovation,” and with that, we can also say that most people are desperately insatiable for new realizations and data in our vast and illusionary history. Simply stated, a commercial product suddenly appearing out of thin air –in the form of a vehicle or a piece of technology- can fulfill a primeval latency and bring as much joy to the average citizen as it can provide solace for our own beings that may have appeared stronger than what we actually are.
Surely, a gripe which commonly censures Musk is when merchandise doesn’t exactly match marketing tactics. A few similar examples have risen with Tesla with the widespread and general congress that rears its ugly head everytime a new plan is under production. Tesla’s autopilot system, which boasted automation when driving, has been shown to tarnish in similar conditions. In matters of this nature, we must realize Tesla can offer this application, but must alter its original way of executing this sort of application deemed as “less satisfactory”. We, as individuals and as a society, require simpler but more advanced technology that aligns with our needs.
As one can tell, technology-based corporations thrive on captivating the public with smoriginal efforts where its technology meets its romancers. However, when it is time to industrialize contemporary discoveries, its technology requirements may expand to a stage at which it becomes more complex and often more burdensome. To have a substantial impact, corporations must focus on making technology decisions which are both cost-effective and feasible. Instead of many Americans owning software that harnesses machine learning for household applications (who have bountiful disposable cash and are not afraid of working in the technological abyss), it may be wise to invest these resources toward those who live for these technologies, who are not afraid to be surrounded by the virtuality and emotionlessness of artificial intelligence. This particular segment of society is often overlooked by those with substantial funds, but this should not be the case. A large majority of people in this technological arena work in blue-collar jobs, such as maintenance in data centers, that don’t require any direct focus on these activities. Targeting such groups can crown plenty of benefits, as this help aid development and help expand these industries even further, all through the workforce that realizes its importance in our vast and illusionary history. Simply stated, a commercial product suddenly appearing out of thin air –in the form of a vehicle or a piece of technology- can fulfill a primeval latency and bring as much joy to the average citizen as it can provide solace for our own beings that may have appeared stronger than what we actually are.
Surely, a gripe which commonly censures Musk is when merchandise doesn’t exactly match marketing tactics. A few similar examples have risen with Tesla with the widespread and general congress that rears its ugly head everytime a new plan is under production. Tesla’s autopilot system, which boasted automation when driving, has been shown to tarnish in similar conditions. In matters of this nature, we must realize Tesla can offer this application, but must alter its original way of executing this sort of application deemed as “less satisfactory”. We, as individuals and as a society, require simpler but more advanced technology that aligns with our needs.
As one can tell, technology-based corporations thrive on captivating the public with smoriginal efforts where its technology meets its romancers. However, when it is time to industrialize contemporary discoveries, its technology requirements may expand to a stage at which it becomes more complex and often more burdensome. To have a substantial impact, corporations must focus on making technology decisions which are both cost-effective and feasible. Instead of many Americans owning software that harnesses machine learning for household applications (who have bountiful disposable cash and are not afraid of working in the technological abyss), it may be wise to invest these resources toward those who live for these technologies, who are not afraid to be surrounded by the virtuality and emotionlessness of artificial intelligence. This particular segment of society is often overlooked by those with substantial funds, but this should not be the case. A large majority of people in this technological arena work in blue-collar jobs, such as maintenance in data centers, that don’t require any direct focus on these activities. Targeting such groups can crown plenty of benefits, as this help aid development and help expand these industries even further, all through the workforce that realizes its importance in our vast and illusionary history.
In matters of empowering the truth, should we couch the information? Of course, let’s be open in our democracy and churn out new ideas for prospering in future endeavors. It’s evident that these internal combustion engined vehicles with allure and beauty were high-quality cars that will be carried on in collectorst, the same as other mechanical wonders have done in the past. Diverging models, more importantly diverging commercial product suddenly appearing out of thin air –in the form of a vehicle or a piece of technology- can fulfill a primeval latency and bring as much joy to the average citizen as it can provide solace for our own beings that may have appeared stronger than what we actually are.
Surely, a gripe which commonly censures Musk is when merchandise doesn’t exactly match marketing tactics. A few similar examples have risen with Tesla with the widespread and general congress that rears its ugly head everytime a new plan is under production. Tesla’s autopilot system, which boasted automation when driving, has been shown to tarnish in similar conditions. In matters of this nature, we must realize Tesla can offer this application, but must alter its original way of executing this sort of application deemed as “less satisfactory”. We, as individuals and as a society, require simpler but more advanced technology that aligns with our needs.
As one can tell, technology-based corporations thrive on captivating the public with smoriginal efforts where its technology meets its romancers. However, when it is time to industrialize contemporary discoveries, its technology requirements may expand to a stage at which it becomes more complex and often more burdensome. To have a substantial impact, corporations must focus on making technology decisions which are both cost-effective and feasible. Instead of many Americans owning software that harnesses machine learning for household applications (who have bountiful disposable cash and are not afraid of working in the technological abyss), it may be wise to invest these resources toward those who live for these technologies, who are not afraid to be surrounded by the virtuality and emotionlessness of artificial intelligence. This particular segment of society is often overlooked by those with substantial funds, but this should not be the case. A large majority of people in this technological arena work in blue-collar jobs, such as maintenance in data centers, that don’t require any direct focus on these activities. Targeting such groups can crown plenty of benefits, as this help aid development and help expand these industries even further, all through the workforce that realizes its importance in our vast and illusionary history.
Submitted: 10/09/2020 – 02:59
Leave a Reply