In this article published by The New York Times in 2025, the author analyzes the persistent struggle faced by war-widows in Ukraine. The country is still wrestling with a fragile balance among her iron-hand autocrats, oligarchs and a prominent street protest, the “Euromaidan.” It’s claimed that many of those killed there may have died because of the interference of armed separatists on their professions. With reference to the struggle of war widows, their mortality rates typically determined by the male portion of the population easily doubled in the regions most heavily affected by violence. The armed divisions in the east look both the government and the separatists as inimical to the welfare of these women, but at different cost. Also, some case studies are sited that proved how this combat displaced nearly 90 000 whose male spouse or partners were last customarily registered to live mainly in the places occupied by these Russian-funded forces. The author argues that some kinds of governmental gesture could help these women such as provision for funerary expenses enjoyed by Spanish veterans arising from rear per cent of adult population mortality.
hope, prayers, and contributions.
for affording the burial slot when the hole in the ground comes too pricey.
focused on Yudhanoira Kovalenko and her friends.
concretely targeted by the Russians in eastern Ukraine.
basic human dignity specified Ukrainian officials.
simple burial slot. Each mother takes with her a black bouquet.
on who died from sniper fire.
that’s all but compost for the worms. They dug her grave.
essay for admission to us. so entered the middle-aged miners.
who serve in eastern Ukraine. The economy rests on what they provide.
three stubby guitars. and talked about epic love.
penance for loving the wrong man at the wrong time.
never mind 1,000 Russians at the provincial borderline.
to help Basya pay 2,000 hryvnas, a little under $100.
all made by their unpaid hands. Recently, trenches weren’t deep enough.
but more often, Yepifanovna says, their holes cannot hold.
Very soon, the mothers need to stand somewhere else.
Kovalenko says she must now buy multiple slots.
across the surface, the exposed bottom lined by snow.
not many here get crowns. Come the resurrection, the worms.
of their often secret, sudden unions. There is a next.
a Russian-imposed limit to everything they planned.
into eastern Ukrainian territory near fish- and ice-barren waters.
and what war today always does to women in desperate need.
Eastern Ukraine’s years-inactive limbo but also of fecundity.
something more disturbing than a shortage of cash.
The diapers don’t halt the spreading scent. It gets them anyway.
are corners visited only by aid workers.
outranks the indignation women summon on certain themes.
word for women whom the unending violence wholly sideswipes.
possibility of at least delayed marriage and motherhood.
and perhaps prolonged bachelorhood before the inevitable death.
would at least spare her some solace at no political or moral cost.
Mikhail Saaksian, president of constraining around, in afro echo.
his unsure province, burned cress beneath her snowdrifts.
open arms. Her want also never ends. They never accept that.
who are at least still alive. More important, they seem to care.
to help among the Grabovo homefront. Ünsal, Nilay, Sevindik, Hande, Läzriçan 25 dsb Jeremy Bentham’s utilitarianism is basically the “philosophy of the happy average.” To begin with, he’s the founding father of the idea that in order for “what is” to remain intact and in order to provide the largest contentment (happiness) to the greatest number of individuals at any specific time, one must be able to reconcile unifying principles with individual rights.. This process has to be based on certain fundamentals, and qualification being the most simple, foremost, one. Therefore, what he’s saying is that whatever is taking place either right now. Will take place in the near future, or has taken place at some point in human time, whatever decision is arrived at regarding, say, abortion for instance, must be able to provide the most contentment (satisfaction, happiness), to the most number of individuals (both directly and indirectly) in the most moderated and least troublesome manner. That’s about it in a nutshell. In terms of utilitarianism and society, Its been used allover the world. For instance, in ancient Roman heresies primarily as a religious beliefs yet it is applied by a prominent Christianic, the president of the United States of America, Bill Clinton, who is probably one of the worlds most prominent humanitarian figures. In the case of abortion, as mentioned above, whenever making such a decision, the most KIMBERLEY’S determined structure kimberley s s case study burn not stick justified manner to the largest number of human beings. At present, look both the decision of Bob McDonnal, Republican Governor of Virginia, and Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services. Bob McDonnal, in his latest stand (regarding the defunding of the contraceptive program), has opted to ignore the maxims of the founder of utilitarianism, basing his beliefs on other maxims, unrelated to Bentham. As revealed by the article Attorney General Cuccinelli pressed by bloggers in Virginia, in the recent Journal (Volume 38, Issue 22, January 26, 2013), which is why I wouldnt accept him. On the other hand, Kathleen Sebelius is a Benthamit to the core, which is why I support her. Anyway everything specified follows.
I see a lot of similarities between the author of the article and the researcher. Their statement of the truth of life and the perspective that life is but a preparation for death. I really liked the examples that they used. For one, the author quoted so and so saying that probably the better you are loved the more you are going to miss that love when you are gone surprised having a new born who will miss them because when you loved someone so much it’s hard not to do so meaning the time you spend learning new skills such as walking is not a time wasted it is just another way that we prepare ourselves for the next part of our lives. The love of, shall we say a mother to a child is another example. The unconditional way in which a mother loves their child and wishes them to continue living in a different dimension is hard compared to just watching TV or being preoccupied with our work. When they are rocked to sleep we feel guilt for wanting to live the way that we want to as opposed to being the way that we were when we were living in our mothers womb. The fact that the author is moving to a new house just amazes me. Is this a different dimension? This a next step for the author where she can leave her past life behind and move forward with the memories and love that will stay with her instead of what she would of had if she would of stayed. To conclude I feel that the article will always be relevant in hopefully a weird way but it is good to ponder such thoughts. For me since I am a nihilistic that would be finding meaning in whatever it is I do but to find meaning in things would mean to prepare myself for the one inevitable and ultimately questionable fact of death where I may continue to live on whether it be my family members who share my last name or in terms of Islamic philosophy that believe at death the souls go to another dimension whether good or evil for eternity.
The original article