The recent episode of Bill Maher’s show, “Real Time,” saw the infamous comedian align himself with former President Donald Trump due to his stance on firing government employees via Twitter. In the episode, Maher debated with Senator Bob Menendez over whether such firings constitute sufficient cause for removal. He argued that it would create a “poisonous environment” in government if such actions were not permissible. Menendez, on the other hand, stated that such sudden actions, which do not allow for adequate legal proceedings, can lead to corruption and further complicate the already problematic American political system.
This case illustrates the intersection of technology, particularly social media, and politics. In Trump’s tenure, social media played a significant role not just in electing him to office but also in his governing style. His propensity to communicate via social media and his drastic, unexpected effects on doctrine favored individuals willing to align themselves with his policy proposals. Maher’s show has become more political than it was in the past, with direct support given to candidates outright. At the same time, his show and its content represents the intersection between traditional media and new media via social media platforms.
This debate highlights the larger question of whether American politics will emerge from the current climate and create a government assertive in the challenges it faces. Alternatively, we may continue to endure the current political climate characterized by increased polarization, combative politics, and an implicit reliance on technology. Maher’s stance is aligning himself with a system still regulated by traditional processes, whereas Menendez wishes to navigate a system that could be in motion due to technological fluctuations.
Leave a Reply