Listing of tags:
1. NATO-Ukraine
2. Sweden-NATO
3. NATO-expansion
4. Russia-Ukraine-crisis
5. Military-alliance
6. European-security-policy
7. Sweden-membership
Tag format:
NATO-Ukraine, Sweden-NATO, NATO-expansion, Russia-Ukraine-crisis, Military-alliance, European-security-policy, Sweden-membership.
Sweden, which has not fought a war for centuries, studied Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea and its descent into war in eastern Ukraine. Having for years drawn Moscow’s ire by hosting American and other NATO troops on its territory in connection with military exercises, reviewing its security policy was a must, officials said.
In February 2018, the government announced it was intensifying its military cooperation with NATO, a first step that the governing Social Democrats seemed prepared to accept.
In April the Social Democrats’ annual congress approved two foreign policy goals that it presented to the coalition. The party’s previous policy had been to remain neutral in conflicts between military alliances and to be neither “for or against NATO expansion.” Now it is officially “for,” and it wants Sweden to join NATO’s tank- and plane-detecting radar system, known as AWACS, and its regional Hunter air control system.
“If Sweden is a NATO member, our country and our people are better ensured against external threats,” Lofven said, announcing that he was convinced.
The haste has led to criticism from the center-right opposition and Sweden’s institute for security policy, which both believe Stockholm would do well to take its time, especially as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada has said that without a clear security policy, the question of granting Sweden membership would not be addressed. Critics said that if it sought quicker passage, Sweden would end up in a negative position in its negotiations with NATO.
Domestically, the Social Democratic party risks a backlash. Surveys show that most Swedes want to stay out of NATO, and many say they would not vote for the party at the next election if it joined.
Still, observers familiar with the handling of contentious decisions in the party believe that the Social Democrats, particularly with the backing of the trade unions, may find it easier to convince at least some of the swing voters who have distanced themselves from the center-left to rally behind a decision to joint NATO again. It would be the first time since 1954 that left-leaning parties have formed a government without first seeking the blessing of the Communists.
The decision in Stockholm will have broader implications, too.
If Sweden joins, as seems likely, Norway is likely to follow suit.
That will represent another diplomatic victory for President Trump, who has been pressuring member states to spend more on their armies.