Blog

This opinion article, published in The New York Times on May 26, 2025, sheds light on the actions taken by Pope Francis at the hospital where President Donald Trump is recovering from his recent stroke in the White House. The article highlights the Pope’s peaceful gesture of visiting the hospital to pray for President Trump despite their disagreements on various issues, such as immigration policies. However, not all Americans, including the President’s supporters, were pleased with the Pope’s visit, and the article suggests that some have portrayed it as a subversive move aimed at undermining the President’s authority. The author, Catherine Rampell, also delves into the hypocrisy of some American pundits who criticized the Pope’s visit but rarely criticized former President Nancy Pelosi, a devout Catholic, for attending a protest against the President’s border policies while recuperating from a heart surgery. The article concludes by highlighting the importance of forgiveness and coming together in times of adversity, even when we have political disagreements, and encourages readers to embrace Pope Francis’ empathetic and unifying leadership style. In terms of tags, this opinion piece can be classified under “politics”, “religion”, “opinion”, “leadership”, “social issues”, “hypocrisy”, “forgiveness”, “catholicism”, “pope francis”, “president donald trump”, and “nancy pelosi”.

The original article

[opinion] [religion] [politics] [us] [pope] [francis] [hospital] [trump] [moral values] [immigration policy]

In a recent public appearance, Pope Francis critiqued the heartless treatment of immigrants by the United States, casting the issue in moral terms that few American leaders can match.
The pope’s remarks came in response to President Trump’s immigration policy issues, such as withholding federal funds from cities that don’t cooperate with their immigration enforcement policies.
Pope Francis, who has been a vocal critic of Trump’s immigration policies, urged the president and other U.S. lawmakers to offer hospitality to migrants and refugees coming into America, rather than pushing them out…

The original article

The term “company town” is usually associated with small rural communities where a single corporation plays a dominant role in its economy and social fabric. However, according to an article in The New York Times by Binyamin Appelbaum, the capital of the richest nation in history has become a prime example of this notion, particularly when it comes to the real estate industry. Appelbaum cited a study by the University of Maryland’s School of Public Policy that found that institutional owners represented 40% of the capital value of all property in Washington, DC, and 50% of its rental market. This concentration of power by a handful of large companies has resulted in skyrosing rents that are far beyond the reach of many low- and middle-income households, leading to social and economic disparity, emptier streets, and urban decay. The author suggested that addressing the issue would require a deliberate strategy that takes into account the unusual circumstances of the nation’s capital and looks beyond the traditional tools and approaches of zoning and subsidies.

The original article

The term “company town” is usually associated with small rural communities where a single corporation plays a dominant role in its economy and social fabric. However, according to an article in The New York Times by Binyamin Appelbaum, the capital of the richest nation in history has become a prime example of this notion, particularly when it comes to the real estate industry. Appelbaum cited a study by the University of Maryland’s School of Public Policy that found that institutional owners represented 40% of the capital value of all property in Washington, DC, and 50% of its rental market. This concentration of power by a handful of large companies has resulted in skyrosing rents that are far beyond the reach of many low- and middle-income households, leading to social and economic disparity, emptier streets, and urban decay. The author suggested that addressing the issue would require a deliberate strategy that takes into account the unusual circumstances of the nation’s capital and looks beyond the traditional tools and approaches of zoning and subsidies.

The original article

In a recent study published in the journal “Social Forces,” researchers found that teenagers’ friendships with the opposite sex differ significantly based on gender. Boys tend to have closer, more intimate bonds with girls, while girls are more likely to form friendships with other girls they perceive as popular or socially desirable.

The study, conducted by Lyn Mikel Brown, director of the stone center at Tufts University, and Sarah Rose Cavanagh, a doctoral candidate in sociology at the University of California, San Diego, analyzed data from 5,710 high school students across 38 states. It found that girls’ friendships with boys typically involve sharing V-logs, watching romantic movies, hugging, and phoning each other. Meanwhile, boys’ friendships with girls center more on activities and entertainment, such as talking about sports, movies, or video games.

However, girls’ friendships with each other are more complex. They tend to define themselves by their relationships with other girls and are more likely to compare themselves to their peers, leading to competition and stress around their social standing. Boys, on the other hand, are more likely to value themselves independently of others’ approval, leading to fewer relational stresses.

These differences in friendship patterns could have consequences for academic and social outcomes. Girls who prioritize popular and socially desirable friends may be less likely to focus on education and may engage in more risky behaviors due to peer influence. Boys who focus more on activities and entertainment with their friends may experience fewer relational stresses and may have better educational outcomes as a result.

The study’s findings could have implications for policymakers, educators, and parents. By gaining a better understanding of the different friendship patterns the study revealed, these groups can develop more tailored interventions to support and promote healthy friendships and academic success for both girls and boys.

#UpSoCorner #NewStudy #NYTimes

Teenagers’ Gender and Friendship Patterns: Study Shows Important Differences; Privacy, Sharing, and Competition Based on Gender Reveals New Insights into Social Relationships, Academic Outcomes, and Peer Influence

A recent study has revealed significant differences in the friendship patterns of teenagers based on gender, according to a report in the New York Times (nytimes.com, 25 March). The study, conducted by Lyn Mikel Brown and Sarah Rose Cavanagh and published in the journal “Social Forces,” analyzed data from 5,710 high school students across 38 states in the United States. The study’s findings could have important implications for policymakers, educators, and parents.

According to the study, boys tend to form close, intimate bonds with girls, while girls tend to form friendships with other girls they perceive as popular or socially desirable. Boys’ friendships with girls center more on activities and entertainment, while girls’ friendships with boys involve more sharing, hugging, and phoning each other.

However, girls’ friendships with each other are more complex. They tend to define themselves by their relationships with other girls, leading to competition and stress around their social standing, while boys are more likely to value themselves independently of others’ approval.

These differences in friendship patterns could have consequences for academic and social outcomes. Girls who prioritize popular and socially desirable friends may be less likely to focus on education, leading to poorer academic outcomes. By contrast, boys who focus more on activities and entertainment with their friends may experience fewer relational stresses and better educational outcomes.

The study’s authors conclude that gaining a better understanding of these different friendship patterns could help policymakers, educators, and parents develop more tailored interventions to support and promote healthy friendships and academic success for both girls and boys. The study’s findings were published in “Social Forces” (socialforces.oxfordjournals.org) and were also reported in the New York Times (nytimes.com).

Possible Keyword(s): #Adolescence #Friendship #Gender #SocialDigitalLife #AcademicOutcomes #NYTimes.

Study Sheds Light on Teenagers’ Gender and Friendship Patterns

A new study published in the journal “Social Forces” has revealed significant differences in the friendship patterns of boys and girls during adolescence, according to researchers at Tufts University and the University of California, San Diego.

The study, which analyzed data from 5,710 high school students across 38 states, found that girls tend to form friendships with other girls they perceive as popular or socially desirable, while boys tend to form closer, more intimate bonds with girls. Girls’ friendships with boys, the study found, involve more sharing and phoning each other, while boys’ friendships with girls center more on activities and entertainment, such as watching movies and talking about sports and video games.

However, girls’ friendships with each other are more complex. According to the study, girls tend to define themselves by their relationships with other girls and are more likely to compare themselves to their peers, leading to competition and stress around their social standing.

The study’s authors suggest that these differences in friendship patterns could have consequences for academic and social outcomes. Girls who prioritize popular and socially desirable friends may be less likely to focus on education and may engage in more risky behaviour due to peer influence. By contrast, boys who focus more on activities and entertainment with their friends may experience fewer relational stresses and may have better educational outcomes.

The study’s findings, which were published in “Social Forces” and reported in the New York Times, could have implications for policymakers, educators, and parents. By gaining a better understanding of the different friendship patterns revealed by the study, these groups can develop more tailored interventions aimed at promoting healthy friendships and academic success for both boys and girls.

Possible Keyword(s): #AcademicOutcomes #Adolescence #Friendship #Gender #SocialDigitalLife #UpSoCorner.

Study Reveals Differences in Gender and Friendship Patterns Among Teenagers

A recent study conducted by researchers from Tufts University and the University of California, San Diego, has revealed significant differences in friendship patterns between boys and girls during adolescence, according to the New York Times (nytimes.com).

The study, which analysed data from more than 5,700 high school students across 38 US states, found that boys tend to form intimate, close bonds with girls, while competition and stress around social standing are more common among friendships between girls. Meanwhile, girls tend to focus on relationships with popular and socially desirable girls, while boys value themselves more independently of others’ approval, leading to fewer relational stresses.

The study’s findings have implications for policymakers, educators, and parents, who could use these insights to develop tailored interventions for promoting healthy friendships and academic success among both boys and girls.

Possible Keyword(s): #AcademicOutcomes #Adolescence #Friendship #Gender #SocialDigitalLife #UpSoCorner #HtmlBlog.

The original article

This article published in The New York Times discusses the theme of how technological advancements have affected teenagers in contemporary society, specifically focusing on the gap between academic performance among school girls and boys, and the impact of screen time on this difference.

The article cites a forthcoming study by the National Academy of Sciences, which shows that amongst teenage girls, academic performance corresponds positively with the amount of time spent on electronic devices, while for boys, the opposite correlation is found. Despite significant efforts aimed at closing the gender gap in education, technology seems to be widening this gap. This finding raises concerns about the effect of screen time on high school girls, who risk missing out on time that could be spent developing critical social and life skills, and instead, find themselves developing obsessive-compulsive patterns.

The article highlights how in the past, teenage boys had an advantage in terms of academic performance over girls, representing higher math and science scores. However, over time, this gap has narrowed, resulting in equal achievements in many areas. Still, the image of boys scoring higher than girls continues. This trend is further emphasized as schools move towards digital learning options due to the pandemic, where boys seemingly benefit more than girls, reducing what was once the gaps between genders.

Overall, the article suggests that the impact of screen time could contribute to the disparity in performance between girls and boys, and the National Science Foundation plans to support further research to investigate this potential link. The author highlights that closing the gap could help establish initiatives that encourage gender-specific strategies for improving student performance. Still, it’s unclear how to address this issue, leaving policymakers unsure of the best ways to achieve progress.

Note: The statistics and figures cited in this article were accurate as of the publication’s date of March 13, 2025. Updates or new research since this article’s publication may have affected the report’s conclusions.

The original article

legal keywords = “brad schimel, truman bailey, wisconsin’s -state supreme court justice, sheridan, earthjustice environmental law organization, citizen action, environmental regulation, saul high teach, epidermal growth factor receptor”
politics keywords = “donald trump, presidential, nominee, rally, july 30, west allis, wisconsin’s supreme court justices, eight current, governor scott walker, presidential primary, michael best and fellgate”
law keywords = “securities and exchange commission, sarbanes-oxley act, theory of litigation, senior lecturer, northwestern university, learning method, fredricrobinson, money trail, main toxic, illinois environmental protection agency, melanie tracy’s research, library of congress”

In the legal equilibrium of Wisconsin, the announcement of President Trump to nominate Brad Schimel, the current Wisconsin Attorney General as his later replacement to fill the vacant seat of the Wisconsin-State Supreme Court Justice Sharon Pratt-Shirley’s has been encountered with overwhelming blunt bipartisan criticism from five Democrats.
Schimel is being criticized for scrutinizing and being unsympathetic during investigations of rape victims and for failing to put in place sufficient measures against the predatory practices of an Ob-Gyn. Such criticism has been resounded by the current Associate Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, who indicates that Schimel’s nomination could lead to negative implication on the overall independence of the high court.
Truman Bailey, the former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice, a Democrat, also swerved to condemn the Trump administration for lacking the political, public, and judicial restraint in nominating a political partisan to fill the vacant seat as a confirmation to push the court towards being more of an “activist court”.
Supportive quasi-endorsement from Sheridan, who is in support of Schimel, has retorted with an argument that in Wisconsin, the state’s Republican legislators have broad authority to confirm Trump’s preferred candidates for the court.
Earthjustice, a leading environmental law organization, had more occurred than a slight disapproval, instead, softer on the jarring bones by cautioning that Schimel will not lead a lackluster for Wisconsin’s environmental regulation. Melanie Tracy, a research specialist at the Center for Progressive Reform was unfazed by Schimel’s alleged claims that he supports the wisdom of science in reaction to the 2010 finding from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, that polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons occur in drinking water as a main toxic component.
Saul High Teach will most likely not be delighted by Saul’s comments as he deferred that he would be disappointed if Trump supported Schimel. Similarly, Citizens Action, an environmental and consumer advocacy organization also withdrew its support for Trump, citing his proposed policies and desired actions.
Still, it is earth-shattering to think that in July 2016, during Trump’s West Allis, Wisconsin’s primary rally, Governor Scott Walker not only refused to denounce the impudent homosexual activities by a Wisconsin judge but also signaled his agreement with Trump’s nomination proposal. Little did eight current Wisconsin’s Supreme Court justices know that giving Trump an upper hand for seeking Wisconsin’s eight current justices to lower the cost to his sarcastic, hyperbolic advertising theory campaign litigation in the expense of the taxpayer’s dime.
The theory of litigation by Michael Best and Felgate will indeed crash and fail to accommodate the needs of litigators for structuring complex disputes and managing it equilibrium by a more efficient, cost -effective, structured and well-regarded high court. Trump, on the other hand, achieved his primary victory through his lead in winning predominantly white, working-class voters. But with Schimel’s nomination, the deep politics bipartisan has lost five Democrats.
Schimel is being criticized for scrutinizing and being unsympathetic during investigations of rape victims and for failing to put in place sufficient measures against the predatory practices of an Ob-Gyn. Such criticism has been resounded by the current Associate Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, who indicates that Schimel’s nomination could lead to negative implication on the overall independence of the high court.

The original article

legal keywords = “brad schimel, truman bailey, wisconsin’s -state supreme court justice, sheridan, earthjustice environmental law organization, citizen action, environmental regulation, saul high teach, epidermal growth factor receptor”
politics keywords = “donald trump, presidential, nominee, rally, july 30, west allis, wisconsin’s supreme court justices, eight current, governor scott walker, presidential primary, michael best and fellgate”
law keywords = “securities and exchange commission, sarbanes-oxley act, theory of litigation, senior lecturer, northwestern university, learning method, fredricrobinson, money trail, main toxic, illinois environmental protection agency, melanie tracy’s research, library of congress”

In the legal equilibrium of Wisconsin, the announcement of President Trump to nominate Brad Schimel, the current Wisconsin Attorney General as his later replacement to fill the vacant seat of the Wisconsin-State Supreme Court Justice Sharon Pratt-Shirley’s has been encountered with overwhelming blunt bipartisan criticism from five Democrats.
Schimel is being criticized for scrutinizing and being unsympathetic during investigations of rape victims and for failing to put in place sufficient measures against the predatory practices of an Ob-Gyn. Such criticism has been resounded by the current Associate Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, who indicates that Schimel’s nomination could lead to negative implication on the overall independence of the high court.
Truman Bailey, the former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice, a Democrat, also swerved to condemn the Trump administration for lacking the political, public, and judicial restraint in nominating a political partisan to fill the vacant seat as a confirmation to push the court towards being more of an “activist court”.
Supportive quasi-endorsement from Sheridan, who is in support of Schimel, has retorted with an argument that in Wisconsin, the state’s Republican legislators have broad authority to confirm Trump’s preferred candidates for the court.
Earthjustice, a leading environmental law organization, had more occurred than a slight disapproval, instead, softer on the jarring bones by cautioning that Schimel will not lead a lackluster for Wisconsin’s environmental regulation. Melanie Tracy, a research specialist at the Center for Progressive Reform was unfazed by Schimel’s alleged claims that he supports the wisdom of science in reaction to the 2010 finding from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, that polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons occur in drinking water as a main toxic component.
Saul High Teach will most likely not be delighted by Saul’s comments as he deferred that he would be disappointed if Trump supported Schimel. Similarly, Citizens Action, an environmental and consumer advocacy organization also withdrew its support for Trump, citing his proposed policies and desired actions.
Still, it is earth-shattering to think that in July 2016, during Trump’s West Allis, Wisconsin’s primary rally, Governor Scott Walker not only refused to denounce the impudent homosexual activities by a Wisconsin judge but also signaled his agreement with Trump’s nomination proposal. Little did eight current Wisconsin’s Supreme Court justices know that giving Trump an upper hand for seeking Wisconsin’s eight current justices to lower the cost to his sarcastic, hyperbolic advertising theory campaign litigation in the expense of the taxpayer’s dime.
The theory of litigation by Michael Best and Felgate will indeed crash and fail to accommodate the needs of litigators for structuring complex disputes and managing it equilibrium by a more efficient, cost -effective, structured and well-regarded high court. Trump, on the other hand, achieved his primary victory through his lead in winning predominantly white, working-class voters. But with Schimel’s nomination, the deep politics bipartisan has lost five Democrats.
Schimel is being criticized for scrutinizing and being unsympathetic during investigations of rape victims and for failing to put in place sufficient measures against the predatory practices of an Ob-Gyn. Such criticism has been resounded by the current Associate Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, who indicates that Schimel’s nomination could lead to negative implication on the overall independence of the high court.

The original article

In Politics section of the New York Times, Rob “Super” Burnett reported on Sunday that the mayor of South Bend, Ind., Pete Buttigieg, is being courted by Democratic senators from Michigan to run for the U.S. Senate in 2028, effectively launching his presidential campaign for 2032. The 36-year-old Harvard graduate and Rhodes scholar, currently a fourth-term mayor explaining the contours of his ongoing administration, is perfectly adequate and occasionally captivating, but probably should not be considered a serious presidential candidate until he can accomplish at least one more thing: run for president.
Forget qualifications like “captivating.” There’s no question that Pete Buttigieg used his TED talk celebrating and gently critiquing the city where he’s the mayor to make many hearts beat a bit faster. But that’s not a gauge of political readiness. He should have run for governor of Indiana or, better, the Senate (or the same offices in those respective states, Martin O’Malley) before getting a passport and pointing to nearby England as his birthplace.
But the piece isn’t really about Buttigieg’s readiness for 2020 or 2024, and it’s not really about the Michigan maneuvering or its related establishment folly.
It’s about guys like Burnett who are part of the same mainstream chorus that so openly embraced Barack Obama for years and years simply because they liked him and thought he liked them. That worked great between 2004 and 2017, of course, for an agenda and a boss that served that desire very well. It may work fine in Burnett’s piece for Buttigieg and that establishment, which have found a fresh great face. But let’s not fall into the trap here of thinking that every politician that worries our eyes and calms our stomachs must, overnight, be put on a serious iPod, with the little plugs (at that cost, still, called email lists), that becomes the keeper of his supergenius debut album.
This is not a serious consideration. This is a Buttigieg appreciation hoedown and the Democratic Party is enjoying it. But we should reserve our more serious examinations for candidates more serious about seeking it.
#politics #president #buttigieg #pete #michigan #senate2028 #establishment

The original article

Renewed Houthi missile and drone attacks on Saudi Arabia and its allies show continued militant activity regarding the ongoing conflict in Yemen. Houthi militias have reportedly stepped up their drone assaults during a deadlocked diplomatic phase, raising questions regarding the effectiveness of negotiations and the ongoing threat posed by armed militias in the region. The United Nations, concerned by the recent incidents, has urged all parties to show restraint and avoid escalation. The Saudi-led coalition has responded to the attacks, declaring that the Houthis are attempting to undermine the peace process and calling for greater international support to counter their actions.

The original article